Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
CurrentWeekly HistorySeason OutlookHistorical Teams
Pocket Pickems
Pocket Pickems
College football, picked together.

Independent pick'em competition

Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
2026 · Canonical snapshots

JT POLL ARCHIVE

How JT's view of college football changed week by week.

Selected archive

Snapshot Entering Week 9

Movement compares with Week 8

Available weeks
Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9
Archived national board

Top 25

Rankings and team profiles are preserved from this canonical weekly publication. Movement reflects JT rank only.

Rank
1
▲ 2
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
FBS Independents
Offense
80
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
58
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.2
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #5
JT +4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.1%
Early-down success
51.4%
Third-down success
43.2%
Yards/play
6.72
Explosive pass rate
14.0%
Explosive rush rate
9.2%
Sack allowed rate
1.0%

Defense

Success allowed
35.5%
Early-down success allowed
33.1%
Third-down success allowed
40.8%
Yards/play allowed
4.59
Explosive pass allowed
6.8%
Explosive rush allowed
6.2%
Sack generated
7.6%

Style

Pass rate
45.8%
Early-down pass rate
44.8%
Plays/drive
6.35

Model Details

JT Rating
28.20
Market Power
28.54
Model Adjustment
-0.34

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

Rank
2
▼ 1
Georgia logo
Georgia
SEC
Offense
94
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
64
2026 percentile
JT Rating
27.9
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #3
JT +1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.9%
Early-down success
50.7%
Third-down success
56.5%
Yards/play
7.66
Explosive pass rate
15.1%
Explosive rush rate
16.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
35.8%
Early-down success allowed
34.3%
Third-down success allowed
38.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
3
▼ 1
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Big Ten
Offense
77
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
48
2026 percentile
JT Rating
26.2
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #2
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.6%
Early-down success
49.3%
Third-down success
44.5%
Yards/play
7.19
Explosive pass rate
17.6%
Explosive rush rate
11.3%
Sack allowed rate
6.8%

Defense

Success allowed
33.7%
Early-down success allowed
32.7%
Third-down success allowed
38.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
4
▲ 1
Alabama logo
Alabama
SEC
Offense
68
Percentile
Defense
80
Percentile
Special Teams
55
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.0
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #10
JT +6 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
47.0%
Early-down success
47.0%
Third-down success
44.0%
Yards/play
6.66
Explosive pass rate
16.5%
Explosive rush rate
15.6%
Sack allowed rate
9.2%

Defense

Success allowed
37.6%
Early-down success allowed
37.7%
Third-down success allowed
34.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
5
▲ 3
Texas logo
Texas
SEC
Offense
25
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
42
2026 percentile
JT Rating
24.7
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #11
JT +6 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.8%
Early-down success
43.8%
Third-down success
37.2%
Yards/play
5.70
Explosive pass rate
9.0%
Explosive rush rate
14.6%
Sack allowed rate
9.3%

Defense

Success allowed
34.7%
Early-down success allowed
35.0%
Third-down success allowed
31.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
6
▼ 2
Miami logo
Miami
ACC
Offense
96
Percentile
Defense
93
Percentile
Special Teams
46
2026 percentile
JT Rating
22.5
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #1
JT -5 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
52.9%
Early-down success
52.5%
Third-down success
53.2%
Yards/play
7.85
Explosive pass rate
16.7%
Explosive rush rate
17.0%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
34.9%
Early-down success allowed
35.6%
Third-down success allowed
34.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
7
▼ 1
LSU logo
LSU
SEC
Offense
83
Percentile
Defense
98
Percentile
Special Teams
35
2026 percentile
JT Rating
22.5
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #15
JT +8 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.0%
Early-down success
49.2%
Third-down success
54.1%
Yards/play
6.62
Explosive pass rate
11.7%
Explosive rush rate
14.5%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
34.7%
Early-down success allowed
35.5%
Third-down success allowed
33.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
8
▼ 1
Indiana logo
Indiana
Big Ten
Offense
76
Percentile
Defense
98
Percentile
Special Teams
48
2026 percentile
JT Rating
22.3
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #4
JT -4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.5%
Early-down success
45.3%
Third-down success
43.9%
Yards/play
7.15
Explosive pass rate
16.9%
Explosive rush rate
15.3%
Sack allowed rate
5.5%

Defense

Success allowed
33.2%
Early-down success allowed
32.0%
Third-down success allowed
34.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
9
—
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
SEC
Offense
75
Percentile
Defense
51
Percentile
Special Teams
48
2026 percentile
JT Rating
20.4
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #12
JT +3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.1%
Early-down success
50.0%
Third-down success
43.5%
Yards/play
6.26
Explosive pass rate
8.7%
Explosive rush rate
15.5%
Sack allowed rate
2.1%

Defense

Success allowed
41.8%
Early-down success allowed
41.0%
Third-down success allowed
44.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
10
▲ 3
Florida logo
Florida
SEC
Offense
69
Percentile
Defense
67
Percentile
Special Teams
66
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.8
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #17
JT +7 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.8%
Early-down success
45.8%
Third-down success
46.9%
Yards/play
6.47
Explosive pass rate
13.1%
Explosive rush rate
13.9%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
42.2%
Early-down success allowed
41.5%
Third-down success allowed
42.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
11
▲ 8
USC logo
USC
Big Ten
Offense
82
Percentile
Defense
73
Percentile
Special Teams
45
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.2
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.8%
Early-down success
49.9%
Third-down success
50.5%
Yards/play
6.36
Explosive pass rate
12.9%
Explosive rush rate
13.9%
Sack allowed rate
3.4%

Defense

Success allowed
41.7%
Early-down success allowed
41.8%
Third-down success allowed
35.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
12
▼ 2
Oregon logo
Oregon
Big Ten
Offense
37
Percentile
Defense
94
Percentile
Special Teams
47
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.5
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.2%
Early-down success
43.6%
Third-down success
36.5%
Yards/play
5.81
Explosive pass rate
11.2%
Explosive rush rate
12.2%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
34.0%
Early-down success allowed
34.7%
Third-down success allowed
27.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
13
▲ 3
Missouri logo
Missouri
SEC
Offense
49
Percentile
Defense
82
Percentile
Special Teams
44
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.0
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #23
JT +10 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
40.3%
Early-down success
39.6%
Third-down success
43.1%
Yards/play
6.28
Explosive pass rate
14.6%
Explosive rush rate
12.0%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
36.8%
Early-down success allowed
36.0%
Third-down success allowed
37.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
14
▼ 3
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
Big 12
Offense
67
Percentile
Defense
66
Percentile
Special Teams
34
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.5
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #13
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.3%
Early-down success
49.6%
Third-down success
40.2%
Yards/play
6.21
Explosive pass rate
9.3%
Explosive rush rate
18.6%
Sack allowed rate
5.5%

Defense

Success allowed
39.9%
Early-down success allowed
40.3%
Third-down success allowed
39.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
15
—
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
SEC
Offense
42
Percentile
Defense
90
Percentile
Special Teams
54
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.1
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #16
JT +1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.9%
Early-down success
46.4%
Third-down success
39.6%
Yards/play
5.88
Explosive pass rate
8.3%
Explosive rush rate
16.6%
Sack allowed rate
8.0%

Defense

Success allowed
38.7%
Early-down success allowed
41.0%
Third-down success allowed
32.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
16
▲ 6
BYU logo
BYU
Big 12
Offense
87
Percentile
Defense
80
Percentile
Special Teams
73
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.0
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #8
JT -8 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.1%
Early-down success
48.6%
Third-down success
56.5%
Yards/play
6.74
Explosive pass rate
13.7%
Explosive rush rate
13.7%
Sack allowed rate
2.2%

Defense

Success allowed
38.9%
Early-down success allowed
37.6%
Third-down success allowed
40.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
17
▼ 3
Utah logo
Utah
Big 12
Offense
89
Percentile
Defense
85
Percentile
Special Teams
34
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.9
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #6
JT -11 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.3%
Early-down success
49.5%
Third-down success
53.4%
Yards/play
6.93
Explosive pass rate
12.7%
Explosive rush rate
18.8%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
34.6%
Early-down success allowed
34.6%
Third-down success allowed
34.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
18
▼ 6
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
SEC
Offense
15
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
65
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.5
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
39.2%
Early-down success
38.5%
Third-down success
39.5%
Yards/play
5.57
Explosive pass rate
13.2%
Explosive rush rate
7.2%
Sack allowed rate
7.1%

Defense

Success allowed
34.1%
Early-down success allowed
35.7%
Third-down success allowed
24.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
19
▲ 2
Michigan logo
Michigan
Big Ten
Offense
9
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.4
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
40.0%
Early-down success
39.2%
Third-down success
39.3%
Yards/play
5.09
Explosive pass rate
8.0%
Explosive rush rate
8.7%
Sack allowed rate
7.2%

Defense

Success allowed
34.7%
Early-down success allowed
34.4%
Third-down success allowed
33.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
20
▼ 3
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
SEC
Offense
28
Percentile
Defense
60
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.3
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.7%
Early-down success
42.0%
Third-down success
43.7%
Yards/play
5.28
Explosive pass rate
7.5%
Explosive rush rate
12.9%
Sack allowed rate
5.6%

Defense

Success allowed
37.6%
Early-down success allowed
38.7%
Third-down success allowed
32.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
21
▲ 10
South Carolina logo
South Carolina
SEC
Offense
64
Percentile
Defense
74
Percentile
Special Teams
72
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.8
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.7%
Early-down success
45.7%
Third-down success
48.8%
Yards/play
6.39
Explosive pass rate
9.2%
Explosive rush rate
16.6%
Sack allowed rate
5.8%

Defense

Success allowed
41.3%
Early-down success allowed
41.2%
Third-down success allowed
37.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
22
▲ 10
Oklahoma State logo
Oklahoma State
Big 12
Offense
93
Percentile
Defense
62
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.1
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #24
JT +2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.7%
Early-down success
53.7%
Third-down success
40.4%
Yards/play
7.61
Explosive pass rate
18.9%
Explosive rush rate
16.3%
Sack allowed rate
3.0%

Defense

Success allowed
41.7%
Early-down success allowed
43.0%
Third-down success allowed
36.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
23
▲ 6
Louisville logo
Louisville
ACC
Offense
90
Percentile
Defense
73
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.7
AP Poll · Week 9
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.1%
Early-down success
50.3%
Third-down success
45.4%
Yards/play
7.78
Explosive pass rate
17.4%
Explosive rush rate
19.6%
Sack allowed rate
6.4%

Defense

Success allowed
41.2%
Early-down success allowed
42.1%
Third-down success allowed
33.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
24
▲ 10
Arizona logo
Arizona
Big 12
Offense
87
Percentile
Defense
91
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.4
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #22
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.0%
Early-down success
48.2%
Third-down success
55.5%
Yards/play
7.15
Explosive pass rate
14.6%
Explosive rush rate
17.2%
Sack allowed rate
6.5%

Defense

Success allowed
34.0%
Early-down success allowed
32.7%
Third-down success allowed
37.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
25
▲ 11
Northwestern logo
Northwestern
Big Ten
Offense
82
Percentile
Defense
62
Percentile
Special Teams
62
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.3
AP Poll · Week 9
AP #20
JT -5 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.0%
Early-down success
49.0%
Third-down success
47.1%
Yards/play
6.97
Explosive pass rate
14.7%
Explosive rush rate
19.1%
Sack allowed rate
7.6%

Defense

Success allowed
42.4%
Early-down success allowed
42.8%
Third-down success allowed
38.1%
Yards/play allowed
4.64
Explosive pass allowed
7.0%
Explosive rush allowed
9.2%
Sack generated
9.1%

Style

Pass rate
47.8%
Early-down pass rate
43.5%
Plays/drive
5.32

Model Details

JT Rating
27.94
Market Power
27.94
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.18
Explosive pass allowed
4.9%
Explosive rush allowed
8.3%
Sack generated
4.0%

Style

Pass rate
47.4%
Early-down pass rate
44.4%
Plays/drive
6.12

Model Details

JT Rating
26.22
Market Power
26.88
Model Adjustment
-0.66

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.70
Explosive pass allowed
14.2%
Explosive rush allowed
8.7%
Sack generated
8.0%

Style

Pass rate
50.6%
Early-down pass rate
46.1%
Plays/drive
5.61

Model Details

JT Rating
24.96
Market Power
24.82
Model Adjustment
+0.14

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.29
Explosive pass allowed
5.1%
Explosive rush allowed
9.9%
Sack generated
7.9%

Style

Pass rate
48.5%
Early-down pass rate
45.1%
Plays/drive
5.70

Model Details

JT Rating
24.69
Market Power
25.39
Model Adjustment
-0.70

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.88
Explosive pass allowed
10.1%
Explosive rush allowed
7.7%
Sack generated
8.0%

Style

Pass rate
48.7%
Early-down pass rate
44.8%
Plays/drive
5.85

Model Details

JT Rating
22.51
Market Power
23.59
Model Adjustment
-1.08

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.41
Explosive pass allowed
8.5%
Explosive rush allowed
11.2%
Sack generated
12.7%

Style

Pass rate
49.8%
Early-down pass rate
47.1%
Plays/drive
6.72

Model Details

JT Rating
22.48
Market Power
22.50
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.47
Explosive pass allowed
9.8%
Explosive rush allowed
7.1%
Sack generated
11.0%

Style

Pass rate
42.9%
Early-down pass rate
36.7%
Plays/drive
5.44

Model Details

JT Rating
22.32
Market Power
23.15
Model Adjustment
-0.83

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.80
Explosive pass allowed
12.8%
Explosive rush allowed
10.6%
Sack generated
5.4%

Style

Pass rate
56.8%
Early-down pass rate
55.3%
Plays/drive
5.83

Model Details

JT Rating
20.39
Market Power
21.67
Model Adjustment
-1.28

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.68
Explosive pass allowed
10.0%
Explosive rush allowed
11.4%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
45.6%
Early-down pass rate
42.5%
Plays/drive
6.17

Model Details

JT Rating
17.77
Market Power
17.75
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.71
Explosive pass allowed
10.5%
Explosive rush allowed
10.1%
Sack generated
7.2%

Style

Pass rate
53.7%
Early-down pass rate
51.2%
Plays/drive
7.25

Model Details

JT Rating
17.22
Market Power
16.49
Model Adjustment
+0.72

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.05
Explosive pass allowed
10.9%
Explosive rush allowed
8.4%
Sack generated
7.5%

Style

Pass rate
55.1%
Early-down pass rate
50.4%
Plays/drive
5.44

Model Details

JT Rating
16.46
Market Power
15.68
Model Adjustment
+0.78

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.12
Explosive pass allowed
9.1%
Explosive rush allowed
12.8%
Sack generated
6.9%

Style

Pass rate
48.1%
Early-down pass rate
39.8%
Plays/drive
5.43

Model Details

JT Rating
16.04
Market Power
15.58
Model Adjustment
+0.46

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.61
Explosive pass allowed
7.3%
Explosive rush allowed
16.2%
Sack generated
6.8%

Style

Pass rate
46.9%
Early-down pass rate
45.6%
Plays/drive
5.65

Model Details

JT Rating
15.51
Market Power
15.64
Model Adjustment
-0.13

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.98
Explosive pass allowed
6.1%
Explosive rush allowed
17.8%
Sack generated
13.0%

Style

Pass rate
40.5%
Early-down pass rate
40.0%
Plays/drive
5.85

Model Details

JT Rating
15.05
Market Power
14.83
Model Adjustment
+0.23

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.82
Explosive pass allowed
7.0%
Explosive rush allowed
11.5%
Sack generated
5.3%

Style

Pass rate
43.5%
Early-down pass rate
41.7%
Plays/drive
5.74

Model Details

JT Rating
15.04
Market Power
15.07
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.27
Explosive pass allowed
8.9%
Explosive rush allowed
11.4%
Sack generated
4.8%

Style

Pass rate
46.1%
Early-down pass rate
45.0%
Plays/drive
5.97

Model Details

JT Rating
14.88
Market Power
15.07
Model Adjustment
-0.19

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.03
Explosive pass allowed
8.5%
Explosive rush allowed
11.9%
Sack generated
12.4%

Style

Pass rate
50.3%
Early-down pass rate
44.9%
Plays/drive
5.49

Model Details

JT Rating
14.51
Market Power
14.67
Model Adjustment
-0.16

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.49
Explosive pass allowed
8.5%
Explosive rush allowed
6.4%
Sack generated
7.8%

Style

Pass rate
42.9%
Early-down pass rate
39.2%
Plays/drive
5.46

Model Details

JT Rating
14.38
Market Power
14.07
Model Adjustment
+0.31

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.85
Explosive pass allowed
14.3%
Explosive rush allowed
12.5%
Sack generated
3.5%

Style

Pass rate
46.9%
Early-down pass rate
46.0%
Plays/drive
6.13

Model Details

JT Rating
14.34
Market Power
14.37
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.31
Explosive pass allowed
11.0%
Explosive rush allowed
9.5%
Sack generated
7.7%

Style

Pass rate
50.1%
Early-down pass rate
47.7%
Plays/drive
6.07

Model Details

JT Rating
13.81
Market Power
13.65
Model Adjustment
+0.16

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.71
Explosive pass allowed
14.9%
Explosive rush allowed
7.9%
Sack generated
6.7%

Style

Pass rate
50.3%
Early-down pass rate
48.4%
Plays/drive
6.14

Model Details

JT Rating
13.11
Market Power
12.49
Model Adjustment
+0.62

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.64
Explosive pass allowed
10.2%
Explosive rush allowed
9.5%
Sack generated
6.6%

Style

Pass rate
45.1%
Early-down pass rate
42.8%
Plays/drive
5.05

Model Details

JT Rating
12.70
Market Power
12.78
Model Adjustment
-0.08

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.71
Explosive pass allowed
9.9%
Explosive rush allowed
12.2%
Sack generated
7.8%

Style

Pass rate
54.1%
Early-down pass rate
50.6%
Plays/drive
6.04

Model Details

JT Rating
12.41
Market Power
12.13
Model Adjustment
+0.28

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.45
Explosive pass allowed
7.6%
Explosive rush allowed
13.6%
Sack generated
5.2%

Style

Pass rate
41.9%
Early-down pass rate
39.0%
Plays/drive
5.82

Model Details

JT Rating
12.34
Market Power
12.42
Model Adjustment
-0.07

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.