Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
CurrentWeekly HistorySeason OutlookHistorical Teams
Pocket Pickems
Pocket Pickems
College football, picked together.

Independent pick'em competition

Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
2026 · Canonical snapshots

JT POLL ARCHIVE

How JT's view of college football changed week by week.

Selected archive

Snapshot Entering Week 7

Movement compares with Week 6

Available weeks
Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9
Archived national board

Top 25

Rankings and team profiles are preserved from this canonical weekly publication. Movement reflects JT rank only.

Rank
1
—
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Big Ten
Offense
83
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
47
2026 percentile
JT Rating
30.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #4
JT +3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.5%
Early-down success
51.7%
Third-down success
45.3%
Yards/play
7.56
Explosive pass rate
17.9%
Explosive rush rate
10.7%
Sack allowed rate
6.0%

Defense

Success allowed
33.2%
Early-down success allowed
32.6%
Third-down success allowed
36.0%
Yards/play allowed
3.99
Explosive pass allowed
4.4%
Explosive rush allowed
9.7%
Sack generated
4.3%

Style

Pass rate
46.7%
Early-down pass rate
44.3%
Plays/drive
6.19

Model Details

JT Rating
30.54
Market Power
30.24
Model Adjustment
+0.30

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

Rank
2
—
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
FBS Independents
Offense
87
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
57
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.9
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #2
JT = AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
53.3%
Early-down success
54.6%
Third-down success
43.4%
Yards/play
7.05
Explosive pass rate
15.3%
Explosive rush rate
9.7%
Sack allowed rate
1.2%

Defense

Success allowed
33.5%
Early-down success allowed
31.2%
Third-down success allowed
36.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
3
▲ 1
Georgia logo
Georgia
SEC
Offense
94
Percentile
Defense
94
Percentile
Special Teams
65
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.2
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #1
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.6%
Early-down success
50.0%
Third-down success
57.6%
Yards/play
7.78
Explosive pass rate
15.4%
Explosive rush rate
17.0%
Sack allowed rate
3.9%

Defense

Success allowed
35.5%
Early-down success allowed
34.1%
Third-down success allowed
38.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
4
▲ 1
Miami logo
Miami
ACC
Offense
97
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
42
2026 percentile
JT Rating
27.0
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #3
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
56.7%
Early-down success
57.4%
Third-down success
49.5%
Yards/play
8.21
Explosive pass rate
17.2%
Explosive rush rate
17.7%
Sack allowed rate
3.8%

Defense

Success allowed
34.4%
Early-down success allowed
34.6%
Third-down success allowed
33.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
5
▼ 2
Texas logo
Texas
SEC
Offense
35
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
32
2026 percentile
JT Rating
26.1
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #7
JT +2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
44.0%
Early-down success
43.7%
Third-down success
43.4%
Yards/play
5.63
Explosive pass rate
9.5%
Explosive rush rate
13.7%
Sack allowed rate
7.8%

Defense

Success allowed
34.8%
Early-down success allowed
36.5%
Third-down success allowed
29.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
6
▲ 2
Alabama logo
Alabama
SEC
Offense
82
Percentile
Defense
80
Percentile
Special Teams
56
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.6
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #6
JT = AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.9%
Early-down success
49.3%
Third-down success
49.2%
Yards/play
7.04
Explosive pass rate
18.2%
Explosive rush rate
16.4%
Sack allowed rate
8.8%

Defense

Success allowed
36.0%
Early-down success allowed
36.1%
Third-down success allowed
32.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
7
▼ 1
Indiana logo
Indiana
Big Ten
Offense
89
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
24.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #5
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.4%
Early-down success
48.5%
Third-down success
44.3%
Yards/play
7.86
Explosive pass rate
19.5%
Explosive rush rate
19.5%
Sack allowed rate
6.1%

Defense

Success allowed
32.4%
Early-down success allowed
31.9%
Third-down success allowed
33.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
8
▲ 1
LSU logo
LSU
SEC
Offense
81
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
38
2026 percentile
JT Rating
22.0
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #22
JT +14 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.6%
Early-down success
47.3%
Third-down success
55.0%
Yards/play
6.75
Explosive pass rate
14.0%
Explosive rush rate
13.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
32.6%
Early-down success allowed
33.2%
Third-down success allowed
31.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
9
▲ 1
Florida logo
Florida
SEC
Offense
80
Percentile
Defense
59
Percentile
Special Teams
65
2026 percentile
JT Rating
19.6
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.9%
Early-down success
48.4%
Third-down success
47.7%
Yards/play
6.90
Explosive pass rate
15.3%
Explosive rush rate
14.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.4%

Defense

Success allowed
42.3%
Early-down success allowed
40.3%
Third-down success allowed
46.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
10
▲ 15
Utah logo
Utah
Big 12
Offense
90
Percentile
Defense
91
Percentile
Special Teams
40
2026 percentile
JT Rating
18.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #11
JT +1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.5%
Early-down success
50.7%
Third-down success
54.2%
Yards/play
7.22
Explosive pass rate
13.0%
Explosive rush rate
17.7%
Sack allowed rate
3.6%

Defense

Success allowed
32.3%
Early-down success allowed
32.7%
Third-down success allowed
29.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
11
▲ 1
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
SEC
Offense
79
Percentile
Defense
34
Percentile
Special Teams
47
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.6
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #9
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
53.3%
Early-down success
54.2%
Third-down success
41.4%
Yards/play
6.56
Explosive pass rate
9.4%
Explosive rush rate
15.9%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
45.0%
Early-down success allowed
43.6%
Third-down success allowed
50.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
12
▼ 5
Oregon logo
Oregon
Big Ten
Offense
48
Percentile
Defense
90
Percentile
Special Teams
54
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.6%
Early-down success
44.0%
Third-down success
41.1%
Yards/play
6.27
Explosive pass rate
13.6%
Explosive rush rate
12.3%
Sack allowed rate
4.4%

Defense

Success allowed
35.0%
Early-down success allowed
37.8%
Third-down success allowed
20.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
13
—
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
SEC
Offense
15
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
70
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.9
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
39.6%
Early-down success
40.8%
Third-down success
35.4%
Yards/play
5.31
Explosive pass rate
12.3%
Explosive rush rate
7.8%
Sack allowed rate
7.1%

Defense

Success allowed
32.4%
Early-down success allowed
33.7%
Third-down success allowed
24.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
14
▼ 3
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
SEC
Offense
47
Percentile
Defense
83
Percentile
Special Teams
58
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #14
JT = AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.5%
Early-down success
45.9%
Third-down success
39.8%
Yards/play
6.25
Explosive pass rate
9.8%
Explosive rush rate
18.1%
Sack allowed rate
8.9%

Defense

Success allowed
39.3%
Early-down success allowed
42.0%
Third-down success allowed
34.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
15
▼ 1
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
Big 12
Offense
65
Percentile
Defense
69
Percentile
Special Teams
35
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.8
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #10
JT -5 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
47.9%
Early-down success
48.3%
Third-down success
44.9%
Yards/play
6.13
Explosive pass rate
9.9%
Explosive rush rate
18.2%
Sack allowed rate
5.1%

Defense

Success allowed
37.5%
Early-down success allowed
37.2%
Third-down success allowed
40.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
16
▲ 12
BYU logo
BYU
Big 12
Offense
93
Percentile
Defense
85
Percentile
Special Teams
61
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.4
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #8
JT -8 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
52.6%
Early-down success
52.0%
Third-down success
56.4%
Yards/play
7.26
Explosive pass rate
15.0%
Explosive rush rate
16.6%
Sack allowed rate
2.4%

Defense

Success allowed
36.5%
Early-down success allowed
36.1%
Third-down success allowed
36.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
17
▼ 2
USC logo
USC
Big Ten
Offense
88
Percentile
Defense
64
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.4
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #19
JT +2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.2%
Early-down success
50.5%
Third-down success
49.3%
Yards/play
6.69
Explosive pass rate
14.2%
Explosive rush rate
15.9%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
41.7%
Early-down success allowed
42.2%
Third-down success allowed
33.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
18
▲ 6
Michigan logo
Michigan
Big Ten
Offense
17
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
61
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.3
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
41.6%
Early-down success
41.5%
Third-down success
39.7%
Yards/play
5.33
Explosive pass rate
9.5%
Explosive rush rate
8.1%
Sack allowed rate
6.8%

Defense

Success allowed
33.2%
Early-down success allowed
32.6%
Third-down success allowed
33.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
19
▼ 2
Penn State logo
Penn State
Big Ten
Offense
32
Percentile
Defense
74
Percentile
Special Teams
49
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.9
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
41.9%
Early-down success
41.9%
Third-down success
34.9%
Yards/play
6.08
Explosive pass rate
14.7%
Explosive rush rate
7.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
39.2%
Early-down success allowed
40.4%
Third-down success allowed
30.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
20
▲ 7
Mississippi State logo
Mississippi State
SEC
Offense
76
Percentile
Defense
65
Percentile
Special Teams
38
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.5
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #16
JT -4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.9%
Early-down success
47.5%
Third-down success
48.9%
Yards/play
7.01
Explosive pass rate
16.0%
Explosive rush rate
15.3%
Sack allowed rate
7.0%

Defense

Success allowed
42.0%
Early-down success allowed
42.1%
Third-down success allowed
38.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
21
▼ 3
Missouri logo
Missouri
SEC
Offense
60
Percentile
Defense
91
Percentile
Special Teams
47
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.6
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #13
JT -8 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.0%
Early-down success
41.2%
Third-down success
44.4%
Yards/play
6.42
Explosive pass rate
14.8%
Explosive rush rate
13.3%
Sack allowed rate
2.3%

Defense

Success allowed
34.6%
Early-down success allowed
34.2%
Third-down success allowed
33.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
22
▲ 10
SMU logo
SMU
ACC
Offense
86
Percentile
Defense
87
Percentile
Special Teams
37
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.4
AP Poll · Week 7
AP #24
JT +2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.6%
Early-down success
49.1%
Third-down success
51.9%
Yards/play
7.33
Explosive pass rate
16.4%
Explosive rush rate
14.0%
Sack allowed rate
3.4%

Defense

Success allowed
36.9%
Early-down success allowed
39.0%
Third-down success allowed
26.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
23
▼ 4
Nebraska logo
Nebraska
Big Ten
Offense
80
Percentile
Defense
93
Percentile
Special Teams
49
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.9
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.1%
Early-down success
46.8%
Third-down success
52.4%
Yards/play
6.51
Explosive pass rate
11.6%
Explosive rush rate
18.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.0%

Defense

Success allowed
34.3%
Early-down success allowed
35.8%
Third-down success allowed
23.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
24
▼ 8
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
SEC
Offense
14
Percentile
Defense
57
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.8
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
40.8%
Early-down success
40.3%
Third-down success
40.0%
Yards/play
4.73
Explosive pass rate
5.7%
Explosive rush rate
12.4%
Sack allowed rate
5.4%

Defense

Success allowed
37.3%
Early-down success allowed
38.9%
Third-down success allowed
30.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
25
▲ 1
Louisville logo
Louisville
ACC
Offense
92
Percentile
Defense
70
Percentile
Special Teams
54
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.1
AP Poll · Week 7
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.9%
Early-down success
51.3%
Third-down success
45.3%
Yards/play
7.89
Explosive pass rate
16.5%
Explosive rush rate
21.3%
Sack allowed rate
5.8%

Defense

Success allowed
40.5%
Early-down success allowed
40.8%
Third-down success allowed
35.7%
Yards/play allowed
4.46
Explosive pass allowed
7.0%
Explosive rush allowed
5.5%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
43.1%
Early-down pass rate
42.7%
Plays/drive
6.21

Model Details

JT Rating
28.91
Market Power
29.47
Model Adjustment
-0.57

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.59
Explosive pass allowed
6.9%
Explosive rush allowed
7.9%
Sack generated
8.1%

Style

Pass rate
45.8%
Early-down pass rate
41.0%
Plays/drive
5.30

Model Details

JT Rating
28.21
Market Power
27.00
Model Adjustment
+1.21

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.30
Explosive pass allowed
6.0%
Explosive rush allowed
6.1%
Sack generated
8.9%

Style

Pass rate
48.5%
Early-down pass rate
45.0%
Plays/drive
5.91

Model Details

JT Rating
27.05
Market Power
26.26
Model Adjustment
+0.79

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.38
Explosive pass allowed
6.0%
Explosive rush allowed
10.1%
Sack generated
10.1%

Style

Pass rate
49.0%
Early-down pass rate
43.9%
Plays/drive
6.11

Model Details

JT Rating
26.09
Market Power
26.71
Model Adjustment
-0.62

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.74
Explosive pass allowed
16.0%
Explosive rush allowed
8.6%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
47.9%
Early-down pass rate
44.0%
Plays/drive
5.88

Model Details

JT Rating
25.62
Market Power
25.46
Model Adjustment
+0.16

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.58
Explosive pass allowed
9.9%
Explosive rush allowed
6.6%
Sack generated
10.9%

Style

Pass rate
41.4%
Early-down pass rate
36.1%
Plays/drive
5.56

Model Details

JT Rating
24.48
Market Power
24.79
Model Adjustment
-0.31

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.47
Explosive pass allowed
10.1%
Explosive rush allowed
10.0%
Sack generated
12.1%

Style

Pass rate
46.8%
Early-down pass rate
43.6%
Plays/drive
6.45

Model Details

JT Rating
22.04
Market Power
22.99
Model Adjustment
-0.94

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.70
Explosive pass allowed
10.9%
Explosive rush allowed
10.7%
Sack generated
6.9%

Style

Pass rate
45.8%
Early-down pass rate
44.0%
Plays/drive
6.08

Model Details

JT Rating
19.59
Market Power
19.65
Model Adjustment
-0.06

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.63
Explosive pass allowed
8.2%
Explosive rush allowed
11.2%
Sack generated
5.1%

Style

Pass rate
44.7%
Early-down pass rate
44.1%
Plays/drive
5.92

Model Details

JT Rating
18.45
Market Power
17.89
Model Adjustment
+0.56

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.81
Explosive pass allowed
13.2%
Explosive rush allowed
10.5%
Sack generated
5.4%

Style

Pass rate
56.9%
Early-down pass rate
55.7%
Plays/drive
5.84

Model Details

JT Rating
17.58
Market Power
17.40
Model Adjustment
+0.17

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.19
Explosive pass allowed
13.0%
Explosive rush allowed
6.4%
Sack generated
6.1%

Style

Pass rate
55.1%
Early-down pass rate
49.1%
Plays/drive
5.40

Model Details

JT Rating
17.53
Market Power
18.58
Model Adjustment
-1.05

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.87
Explosive pass allowed
10.6%
Explosive rush allowed
10.7%
Sack generated
12.5%

Style

Pass rate
49.1%
Early-down pass rate
43.1%
Plays/drive
5.08

Model Details

JT Rating
16.89
Market Power
17.56
Model Adjustment
-0.67

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.12
Explosive pass allowed
6.1%
Explosive rush allowed
18.3%
Sack generated
12.7%

Style

Pass rate
40.8%
Early-down pass rate
40.2%
Plays/drive
5.66

Model Details

JT Rating
16.49
Market Power
16.65
Model Adjustment
-0.16

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.21
Explosive pass allowed
6.2%
Explosive rush allowed
15.3%
Sack generated
5.3%

Style

Pass rate
45.9%
Early-down pass rate
43.1%
Plays/drive
5.58

Model Details

JT Rating
15.85
Market Power
16.95
Model Adjustment
-1.10

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.71
Explosive pass allowed
6.2%
Explosive rush allowed
12.8%
Sack generated
7.0%

Style

Pass rate
40.2%
Early-down pass rate
38.9%
Plays/drive
5.56

Model Details

JT Rating
15.38
Market Power
14.71
Model Adjustment
+0.67

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

6.03
Explosive pass allowed
12.0%
Explosive rush allowed
10.2%
Sack generated
6.5%

Style

Pass rate
51.0%
Early-down pass rate
49.0%
Plays/drive
7.07

Model Details

JT Rating
15.36
Market Power
15.86
Model Adjustment
-0.51

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.42
Explosive pass allowed
7.9%
Explosive rush allowed
7.8%
Sack generated
8.6%

Style

Pass rate
43.2%
Early-down pass rate
40.0%
Plays/drive
5.63

Model Details

JT Rating
15.35
Market Power
16.53
Model Adjustment
-1.18

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.34
Explosive pass allowed
6.6%
Explosive rush allowed
14.7%
Sack generated
5.1%

Style

Pass rate
48.7%
Early-down pass rate
45.1%
Plays/drive
5.82

Model Details

JT Rating
14.92
Market Power
13.71
Model Adjustment
+1.21

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.31
Explosive pass allowed
12.0%
Explosive rush allowed
9.1%
Sack generated
7.3%

Style

Pass rate
50.9%
Early-down pass rate
48.3%
Plays/drive
6.04

Model Details

JT Rating
14.53
Market Power
14.90
Model Adjustment
-0.37

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.85
Explosive pass allowed
9.2%
Explosive rush allowed
11.9%
Sack generated
8.0%

Style

Pass rate
45.2%
Early-down pass rate
37.7%
Plays/drive
5.28

Model Details

JT Rating
13.60
Market Power
13.98
Model Adjustment
-0.38

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.22
Explosive pass allowed
7.6%
Explosive rush allowed
14.3%
Sack generated
9.5%

Style

Pass rate
52.2%
Early-down pass rate
49.9%
Plays/drive
5.75

Model Details

JT Rating
13.37
Market Power
14.60
Model Adjustment
-1.23

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.44
Explosive pass allowed
9.7%
Explosive rush allowed
12.7%
Sack generated
10.1%

Style

Pass rate
47.7%
Early-down pass rate
44.6%
Plays/drive
6.69

Model Details

JT Rating
12.92
Market Power
13.37
Model Adjustment
-0.45

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

6.04
Explosive pass allowed
14.2%
Explosive rush allowed
13.6%
Sack generated
3.7%

Style

Pass rate
49.6%
Early-down pass rate
48.4%
Plays/drive
6.12

Model Details

JT Rating
12.75
Market Power
13.86
Model Adjustment
-1.11

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.63
Explosive pass allowed
10.1%
Explosive rush allowed
9.6%
Sack generated
6.0%

Style

Pass rate
44.7%
Early-down pass rate
43.0%
Plays/drive
5.17

Model Details

JT Rating
12.07
Market Power
11.56
Model Adjustment
+0.51

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.