Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
CurrentWeekly HistorySeason OutlookHistorical Teams
Pocket Pickems
Pocket Pickems
College football, picked together.

Independent pick'em competition

Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
2026 · Canonical snapshots

JT POLL ARCHIVE

How JT's view of college football changed week by week.

Selected archive

Snapshot Entering Week 4

First snapshot

Available weeks
Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9
Live JT archive begins Week 4. Earlier reconstructed snapshots are not yet available.
Archived national board

Top 25

Rankings and team profiles are preserved from this canonical weekly publication. Movement reflects JT rank only.

Rank
1
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Big Ten
Offense
76
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
31.9
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #7
JT +6 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.4%
Early-down success
52.1%
Third-down success
37.8%
Yards/play
7.98
Explosive pass rate
17.3%
Explosive rush rate
12.0%
Sack allowed rate
4.8%

Defense

Success allowed
30.3%
Early-down success allowed
29.1%
Third-down success allowed
34.2%
Yards/play allowed
3.36
Explosive pass allowed
3.4%
Explosive rush allowed
7.3%
Sack generated
4.1%

Style

Pass rate
50.7%
Early-down pass rate
48.4%
Plays/drive
5.48

Model Details

JT Rating
31.90
Market Power
31.37
Model Adjustment
+0.53

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

Rank
2
Indiana logo
Indiana
Big Ten
Offense
91
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
50
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.9
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #5
JT +3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.6%
Early-down success
51.1%
Third-down success
48.5%
Yards/play
8.03
Explosive pass rate
24.8%
Explosive rush rate
17.3%
Sack allowed rate
6.2%

Defense

Success allowed
28.8%
Early-down success allowed
28.2%
Third-down success allowed
31.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
3
Texas logo
Texas
SEC
Offense
54
Percentile
Defense
72
Percentile
Special Teams
46
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.9
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #1
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.6%
Early-down success
45.8%
Third-down success
56.9%
Yards/play
5.53
Explosive pass rate
5.8%
Explosive rush rate
14.0%
Sack allowed rate
3.6%

Defense

Success allowed
36.2%
Early-down success allowed
36.8%
Third-down success allowed
36.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
4
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
FBS Independents
Offense
69
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
56
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.5
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #3
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.2%
Early-down success
51.3%
Third-down success
41.7%
Yards/play
6.33
Explosive pass rate
17.2%
Explosive rush rate
8.7%
Sack allowed rate
2.4%

Defense

Success allowed
32.1%
Early-down success allowed
29.9%
Third-down success allowed
30.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
5
Georgia logo
Georgia
SEC
Offense
98
Percentile
Defense
94
Percentile
Special Teams
65
2026 percentile
JT Rating
27.8
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #2
JT -3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
57.8%
Early-down success
56.6%
Third-down success
62.9%
Yards/play
8.65
Explosive pass rate
16.6%
Explosive rush rate
23.8%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
33.2%
Early-down success allowed
31.1%
Third-down success allowed
40.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
6
Oregon logo
Oregon
Big Ten
Offense
68
Percentile
Defense
89
Percentile
Special Teams
49
2026 percentile
JT Rating
26.8
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #20
JT +14 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.6%
Early-down success
47.5%
Third-down success
49.2%
Yards/play
6.83
Explosive pass rate
16.0%
Explosive rush rate
14.9%
Sack allowed rate
6.4%

Defense

Success allowed
32.7%
Early-down success allowed
35.8%
Third-down success allowed
20.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
7
Miami logo
Miami
ACC
Offense
97
Percentile
Defense
93
Percentile
Special Teams
39
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.2
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #6
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
57.7%
Early-down success
57.6%
Third-down success
53.7%
Yards/play
8.63
Explosive pass rate
17.0%
Explosive rush rate
19.3%
Sack allowed rate
1.0%

Defense

Success allowed
33.8%
Early-down success allowed
37.6%
Third-down success allowed
24.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
8
LSU logo
LSU
SEC
Offense
71
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
43
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.0
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #10
JT +2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
47.7%
Early-down success
43.3%
Third-down success
61.3%
Yards/play
6.47
Explosive pass rate
15.8%
Explosive rush rate
14.5%
Sack allowed rate
5.8%

Defense

Success allowed
29.6%
Early-down success allowed
27.6%
Third-down success allowed
36.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
9
Alabama logo
Alabama
SEC
Offense
71
Percentile
Defense
79
Percentile
Special Teams
63
2026 percentile
JT Rating
22.9
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #8
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.5%
Early-down success
49.5%
Third-down success
44.0%
Yards/play
6.61
Explosive pass rate
15.2%
Explosive rush rate
18.8%
Sack allowed rate
6.8%

Defense

Success allowed
33.7%
Early-down success allowed
36.3%
Third-down success allowed
23.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
10
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
SEC
Offense
86
Percentile
Defense
75
Percentile
Special Teams
56
2026 percentile
JT Rating
21.4
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #14
JT +4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.9%
Early-down success
51.9%
Third-down success
47.5%
Yards/play
7.39
Explosive pass rate
11.0%
Explosive rush rate
23.0%
Sack allowed rate
3.9%

Defense

Success allowed
38.1%
Early-down success allowed
38.8%
Third-down success allowed
39.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
11
Florida logo
Florida
SEC
Offense
88
Percentile
Defense
80
Percentile
Special Teams
62
2026 percentile
JT Rating
20.8
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #21
JT +10 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.3%
Early-down success
49.2%
Third-down success
46.3%
Yards/play
8.10
Explosive pass rate
20.1%
Explosive rush rate
17.1%
Sack allowed rate
3.9%

Defense

Success allowed
36.4%
Early-down success allowed
33.4%
Third-down success allowed
41.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
12
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
SEC
Offense
32
Percentile
Defense
65
Percentile
Special Teams
39
2026 percentile
JT Rating
19.9
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #23
JT +11 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.1%
Early-down success
46.0%
Third-down success
42.6%
Yards/play
5.10
Explosive pass rate
4.9%
Explosive rush rate
12.5%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
35.2%
Early-down success allowed
36.6%
Third-down success allowed
25.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
13
USC logo
USC
Big Ten
Offense
96
Percentile
Defense
54
Percentile
Special Teams
58
2026 percentile
JT Rating
19.5
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #12
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
56.1%
Early-down success
55.0%
Third-down success
61.5%
Yards/play
7.21
Explosive pass rate
15.4%
Explosive rush rate
18.0%
Sack allowed rate
2.1%

Defense

Success allowed
41.6%
Early-down success allowed
42.6%
Third-down success allowed
38.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
14
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
SEC
Offense
71
Percentile
Defense
42
Percentile
Special Teams
48
2026 percentile
JT Rating
19.2
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #4
JT -10 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.7%
Early-down success
50.6%
Third-down success
43.1%
Yards/play
6.49
Explosive pass rate
9.6%
Explosive rush rate
15.5%
Sack allowed rate
2.3%

Defense

Success allowed
41.8%
Early-down success allowed
40.7%
Third-down success allowed
42.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
15
Penn State logo
Penn State
Big Ten
Offense
77
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
56
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.2
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #13
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.9%
Early-down success
48.0%
Third-down success
40.0%
Yards/play
7.52
Explosive pass rate
22.2%
Explosive rush rate
11.7%
Sack allowed rate
3.6%

Defense

Success allowed
30.6%
Early-down success allowed
32.8%
Third-down success allowed
18.9%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
16
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
SEC
Offense
40
Percentile
Defense
99
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.5
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
43.1%
Early-down success
42.1%
Third-down success
46.2%
Yards/play
5.81
Explosive pass rate
16.2%
Explosive rush rate
9.5%
Sack allowed rate
5.6%

Defense

Success allowed
28.7%
Early-down success allowed
29.8%
Third-down success allowed
22.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
17
Auburn logo
Auburn
SEC
Offense
46
Percentile
Defense
58
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.1
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.9%
Early-down success
44.1%
Third-down success
49.5%
Yards/play
6.12
Explosive pass rate
13.3%
Explosive rush rate
16.9%
Sack allowed rate
10.5%

Defense

Success allowed
39.6%
Early-down success allowed
38.3%
Third-down success allowed
40.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
18
SMU logo
SMU
ACC
Offense
87
Percentile
Defense
68
Percentile
Special Teams
41
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.0
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #22
JT +4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.9%
Early-down success
52.8%
Third-down success
47.6%
Yards/play
8.24
Explosive pass rate
16.8%
Explosive rush rate
13.0%
Sack allowed rate
2.8%

Defense

Success allowed
38.4%
Early-down success allowed
42.3%
Third-down success allowed
19.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
19
Louisville logo
Louisville
ACC
Offense
91
Percentile
Defense
60
Percentile
Special Teams
64
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.8
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #16
JT -3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
52.5%
Early-down success
54.2%
Third-down success
45.4%
Yards/play
8.00
Explosive pass rate
18.1%
Explosive rush rate
18.9%
Sack allowed rate
3.1%

Defense

Success allowed
39.0%
Early-down success allowed
39.4%
Third-down success allowed
33.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
20
Washington logo
Washington
Big Ten
Offense
59
Percentile
Defense
79
Percentile
Special Teams
43
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.7
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.8%
Early-down success
47.7%
Third-down success
40.9%
Yards/play
6.70
Explosive pass rate
11.1%
Explosive rush rate
13.0%
Sack allowed rate
2.5%

Defense

Success allowed
34.5%
Early-down success allowed
35.8%
Third-down success allowed
30.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
21
Kansas State logo
Kansas State
Big 12
Offense
95
Percentile
Defense
98
Percentile
Special Teams
59
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.4
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
54.2%
Early-down success
49.6%
Third-down success
68.9%
Yards/play
7.38
Explosive pass rate
11.2%
Explosive rush rate
21.9%
Sack allowed rate
0.0%

Defense

Success allowed
27.4%
Early-down success allowed
26.3%
Third-down success allowed
29.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
22
BYU logo
BYU
Big 12
Offense
99
Percentile
Defense
67
Percentile
Special Teams
54
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.6
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #9
JT -13 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
60.6%
Early-down success
59.8%
Third-down success
64.0%
Yards/play
8.17
Explosive pass rate
19.5%
Explosive rush rate
18.9%
Sack allowed rate
2.7%

Defense

Success allowed
38.6%
Early-down success allowed
36.6%
Third-down success allowed
46.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
23
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
Big 12
Offense
55
Percentile
Defense
62
Percentile
Special Teams
30
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.4
AP Poll · Week 4
AP #11
JT -12 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
47.2%
Early-down success
45.7%
Third-down success
51.8%
Yards/play
6.10
Explosive pass rate
12.3%
Explosive rush rate
13.3%
Sack allowed rate
6.2%

Defense

Success allowed
37.0%
Early-down success allowed
35.6%
Third-down success allowed
42.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
24
South Carolina logo
South Carolina
SEC
Offense
84
Percentile
Defense
89
Percentile
Special Teams
77
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.1
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
52.2%
Early-down success
50.3%
Third-down success
57.4%
Yards/play
7.22
Explosive pass rate
10.7%
Explosive rush rate
18.9%
Sack allowed rate
4.5%

Defense

Success allowed
32.6%
Early-down success allowed
31.3%
Third-down success allowed
33.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
25
Baylor logo
Baylor
Big 12
Offense
32
Percentile
Defense
90
Percentile
Special Teams
56
2026 percentile
JT Rating
11.5
AP Poll · Week 4
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
42.5%
Early-down success
41.4%
Third-down success
42.5%
Yards/play
5.76
Explosive pass rate
12.2%
Explosive rush rate
10.5%
Sack allowed rate
5.2%

Defense

Success allowed
29.8%
Early-down success allowed
25.5%
Third-down success allowed
42.9%
Yards/play allowed
4.16
Explosive pass allowed
7.8%
Explosive rush allowed
4.5%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
34.9%
Early-down pass rate
29.2%
Plays/drive
5.60

Model Details

JT Rating
28.94
Market Power
28.75
Model Adjustment
+0.19

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.94
Explosive pass allowed
7.6%
Explosive rush allowed
10.5%
Sack generated
5.5%

Style

Pass rate
47.8%
Early-down pass rate
41.6%
Plays/drive
7.26

Model Details

JT Rating
28.89
Market Power
29.21
Model Adjustment
-0.32

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.08
Explosive pass allowed
7.9%
Explosive rush allowed
3.5%
Sack generated
10.4%

Style

Pass rate
45.8%
Early-down pass rate
44.9%
Plays/drive
6.43

Model Details

JT Rating
28.48
Market Power
27.32
Model Adjustment
+1.16

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

3.53
Explosive pass allowed
4.1%
Explosive rush allowed
5.3%
Sack generated
7.4%

Style

Pass rate
44.7%
Early-down pass rate
41.6%
Plays/drive
4.88

Model Details

JT Rating
27.76
Market Power
26.78
Model Adjustment
+0.98

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.02
Explosive pass allowed
11.1%
Explosive rush allowed
4.1%
Sack generated
6.0%

Style

Pass rate
55.6%
Early-down pass rate
49.7%
Plays/drive
5.54

Model Details

JT Rating
26.76
Market Power
25.66
Model Adjustment
+1.10

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.10
Explosive pass allowed
4.5%
Explosive rush allowed
5.8%
Sack generated
6.4%

Style

Pass rate
47.5%
Early-down pass rate
44.9%
Plays/drive
5.52

Model Details

JT Rating
25.23
Market Power
26.40
Model Adjustment
-1.17

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.25
Explosive pass allowed
11.4%
Explosive rush allowed
7.3%
Sack generated
14.0%

Style

Pass rate
45.9%
Early-down pass rate
41.6%
Plays/drive
6.83

Model Details

JT Rating
24.98
Market Power
25.08
Model Adjustment
-0.10

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.39
Explosive pass allowed
20.5%
Explosive rush allowed
5.5%
Sack generated
11.4%

Style

Pass rate
43.8%
Early-down pass rate
40.5%
Plays/drive
6.06

Model Details

JT Rating
22.88
Market Power
22.02
Model Adjustment
+0.85

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.75
Explosive pass allowed
2.6%
Explosive rush allowed
20.0%
Sack generated
12.0%

Style

Pass rate
37.2%
Early-down pass rate
37.9%
Plays/drive
6.13

Model Details

JT Rating
21.41
Market Power
21.36
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.42
Explosive pass allowed
7.6%
Explosive rush allowed
10.4%
Sack generated
8.3%

Style

Pass rate
41.6%
Early-down pass rate
40.7%
Plays/drive
6.21

Model Details

JT Rating
20.79
Market Power
20.01
Model Adjustment
+0.77

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.63
Explosive pass allowed
16.1%
Explosive rush allowed
10.4%
Sack generated
6.1%

Style

Pass rate
50.1%
Early-down pass rate
50.2%
Plays/drive
6.70

Model Details

JT Rating
19.87
Market Power
20.00
Model Adjustment
-0.14

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.74
Explosive pass allowed
10.9%
Explosive rush allowed
11.3%
Sack generated
6.6%

Style

Pass rate
47.9%
Early-down pass rate
45.1%
Plays/drive
7.18

Model Details

JT Rating
19.50
Market Power
19.93
Model Adjustment
-0.43

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.88
Explosive pass allowed
14.1%
Explosive rush allowed
11.1%
Sack generated
6.6%

Style

Pass rate
59.2%
Early-down pass rate
57.6%
Plays/drive
6.37

Model Details

JT Rating
19.16
Market Power
19.83
Model Adjustment
-0.67

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

3.79
Explosive pass allowed
1.5%
Explosive rush allowed
10.2%
Sack generated
6.1%

Style

Pass rate
41.3%
Early-down pass rate
37.1%
Plays/drive
5.90

Model Details

JT Rating
17.20
Market Power
16.76
Model Adjustment
+0.44

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

3.84
Explosive pass allowed
7.3%
Explosive rush allowed
10.7%
Sack generated
17.6%

Style

Pass rate
46.7%
Early-down pass rate
40.1%
Plays/drive
5.60

Model Details

JT Rating
16.51
Market Power
15.90
Model Adjustment
+0.60

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.26
Explosive pass allowed
13.8%
Explosive rush allowed
7.7%
Sack generated
6.1%

Style

Pass rate
53.0%
Early-down pass rate
49.8%
Plays/drive
6.52

Model Details

JT Rating
15.11
Market Power
14.91
Model Adjustment
+0.20

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.50
Explosive pass allowed
8.5%
Explosive rush allowed
13.5%
Sack generated
5.6%

Style

Pass rate
53.0%
Early-down pass rate
49.1%
Plays/drive
5.52

Model Details

JT Rating
15.04
Market Power
15.41
Model Adjustment
-0.37

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.55
Explosive pass allowed
7.5%
Explosive rush allowed
10.3%
Sack generated
2.8%

Style

Pass rate
42.6%
Early-down pass rate
41.4%
Plays/drive
4.97

Model Details

JT Rating
14.82
Market Power
15.08
Model Adjustment
-0.27

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.95
Explosive pass allowed
7.1%
Explosive rush allowed
15.9%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
57.5%
Early-down pass rate
56.4%
Plays/drive
5.71

Model Details

JT Rating
14.70
Market Power
14.07
Model Adjustment
+0.63

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

3.40
Explosive pass allowed
3.8%
Explosive rush allowed
18.6%
Sack generated
13.5%

Style

Pass rate
42.4%
Early-down pass rate
39.6%
Plays/drive
6.19

Model Details

JT Rating
14.37
Market Power
13.76
Model Adjustment
+0.61

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.72
Explosive pass allowed
6.4%
Explosive rush allowed
9.1%
Sack generated
4.0%

Style

Pass rate
37.1%
Early-down pass rate
36.2%
Plays/drive
5.54

Model Details

JT Rating
12.59
Market Power
11.61
Model Adjustment
+0.98

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.41
Explosive pass allowed
5.0%
Explosive rush allowed
18.0%
Sack generated
6.5%

Style

Pass rate
46.3%
Early-down pass rate
42.7%
Plays/drive
5.95

Model Details

JT Rating
12.40
Market Power
12.69
Model Adjustment
-0.29

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.52
Explosive pass allowed
10.3%
Explosive rush allowed
7.1%
Sack generated
8.2%

Style

Pass rate
47.3%
Early-down pass rate
42.5%
Plays/drive
6.46

Model Details

JT Rating
12.12
Market Power
11.84
Model Adjustment
+0.27

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.10
Explosive pass allowed
7.5%
Explosive rush allowed
14.5%
Sack generated
10.0%

Style

Pass rate
48.5%
Early-down pass rate
42.7%
Plays/drive
6.26

Model Details

JT Rating
11.52
Market Power
12.25
Model Adjustment
-0.73

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.