Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
CurrentWeekly HistorySeason OutlookHistorical Teams
Pocket Pickems
Pocket Pickems
College football, picked together.

Independent pick'em competition

Pocket Pickems
Pocket
Pickems
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
Menu+
DashboardJT POLLResearch CenterLeaguesRelease 2
Log InSign Up
2026 · Canonical snapshots

JT POLL ARCHIVE

How JT's view of college football changed week by week.

Selected archive

Snapshot Entering Week 8

Movement compares with Week 7

Available weeks
Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 7Week 8Week 9
Archived national board

Top 25

Rankings and team profiles are preserved from this canonical weekly publication. Movement reflects JT rank only.

Rank
1
▲ 2
Georgia logo
Georgia
SEC
Offense
94
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
64
2026 percentile
JT Rating
29.0
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #5
JT +4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.9%
Early-down success
50.7%
Third-down success
56.5%
Yards/play
7.66
Explosive pass rate
15.1%
Explosive rush rate
16.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
35.8%
Early-down success allowed
34.3%
Third-down success allowed
38.6%
Yards/play allowed
4.64
Explosive pass allowed
7.0%
Explosive rush allowed
9.2%
Sack generated
9.1%

Style

Pass rate
47.8%
Early-down pass rate
43.5%
Plays/drive
5.32

Model Details

JT Rating
29.00
Market Power
29.10
Model Adjustment
-0.09

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

Rank
2
▼ 1
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Big Ten
Offense
77
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
48
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.9
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #3
JT +1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.6%
Early-down success
49.3%
Third-down success
44.5%
Yards/play
7.19
Explosive pass rate
17.6%
Explosive rush rate
11.3%
Sack allowed rate
6.8%

Defense

Success allowed
33.7%
Early-down success allowed
32.7%
Third-down success allowed
38.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
3
▼ 1
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
FBS Independents
Offense
80
Percentile
Defense
95
Percentile
Special Teams
57
2026 percentile
JT Rating
28.0
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #4
JT +1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.1%
Early-down success
51.4%
Third-down success
43.2%
Yards/play
6.72
Explosive pass rate
14.0%
Explosive rush rate
9.2%
Sack allowed rate
1.0%

Defense

Success allowed
35.5%
Early-down success allowed
33.1%
Third-down success allowed
40.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
4
—
Miami logo
Miami
ACC
Offense
96
Percentile
Defense
94
Percentile
Special Teams
45
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.7
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #1
JT -3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
54.6%
Early-down success
55.1%
Third-down success
50.1%
Yards/play
8.03
Explosive pass rate
17.2%
Explosive rush rate
17.5%
Sack allowed rate
3.6%

Defense

Success allowed
34.4%
Early-down success allowed
34.8%
Third-down success allowed
34.5%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
5
▲ 1
Alabama logo
Alabama
SEC
Offense
66
Percentile
Defense
80
Percentile
Special Teams
60
2026 percentile
JT Rating
25.5
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #13
JT +8 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
47.4%
Early-down success
47.4%
Third-down success
44.3%
Yards/play
6.56
Explosive pass rate
16.1%
Explosive rush rate
16.1%
Sack allowed rate
9.6%

Defense

Success allowed
37.6%
Early-down success allowed
37.8%
Third-down success allowed
33.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
6
▲ 2
LSU logo
LSU
SEC
Offense
83
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
36
2026 percentile
JT Rating
24.7
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #18
JT +12 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.7%
Early-down success
49.6%
Third-down success
56.3%
Yards/play
6.58
Explosive pass rate
12.7%
Explosive rush rate
12.7%
Sack allowed rate
4.3%

Defense

Success allowed
34.6%
Early-down success allowed
35.9%
Third-down success allowed
33.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
7
—
Indiana logo
Indiana
Big Ten
Offense
83
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
49
2026 percentile
JT Rating
24.5
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #6
JT -1 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.7%
Early-down success
46.3%
Third-down success
45.1%
Yards/play
7.50
Explosive pass rate
17.8%
Explosive rush rate
16.7%
Sack allowed rate
5.6%

Defense

Success allowed
33.3%
Early-down success allowed
32.4%
Third-down success allowed
34.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
8
▼ 3
Texas logo
Texas
SEC
Offense
26
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
37
2026 percentile
JT Rating
23.1
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #19
JT +11 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
43.7%
Early-down success
44.5%
Third-down success
39.5%
Yards/play
5.62
Explosive pass rate
8.8%
Explosive rush rate
14.1%
Sack allowed rate
9.8%

Defense

Success allowed
34.7%
Early-down success allowed
35.4%
Third-down success allowed
31.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
9
▲ 2
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
SEC
Offense
83
Percentile
Defense
46
Percentile
Special Teams
47
2026 percentile
JT Rating
20.1
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #7
JT -2 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
52.7%
Early-down success
52.9%
Third-down success
45.2%
Yards/play
6.59
Explosive pass rate
9.2%
Explosive rush rate
16.3%
Sack allowed rate
2.1%

Defense

Success allowed
42.5%
Early-down success allowed
41.2%
Third-down success allowed
47.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
10
▲ 2
Oregon logo
Oregon
Big Ten
Offense
37
Percentile
Defense
93
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
19.9
AP Poll · Week 8
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
41.7%
Early-down success
42.9%
Third-down success
38.1%
Yards/play
5.79
Explosive pass rate
11.8%
Explosive rush rate
12.0%
Sack allowed rate
4.1%

Defense

Success allowed
33.6%
Early-down success allowed
35.3%
Third-down success allowed
24.1%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
11
▲ 4
Texas Tech logo
Texas Tech
Big 12
Offense
74
Percentile
Defense
68
Percentile
Special Teams
36
2026 percentile
JT Rating
18.3
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #8
JT -3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
49.6%
Early-down success
50.4%
Third-down success
43.5%
Yards/play
6.42
Explosive pass rate
9.5%
Explosive rush rate
18.4%
Sack allowed rate
4.9%

Defense

Success allowed
38.9%
Early-down success allowed
39.2%
Third-down success allowed
39.6%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
12
▲ 1
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
SEC
Offense
14
Percentile
Defense
97
Percentile
Special Teams
71
2026 percentile
JT Rating
17.4
AP Poll · Week 8
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
40.2%
Early-down success
40.2%
Third-down success
38.8%
Yards/play
5.43
Explosive pass rate
13.1%
Explosive rush rate
7.1%
Sack allowed rate
7.7%

Defense

Success allowed
33.7%
Early-down success allowed
34.6%
Third-down success allowed
27.3%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
13
▼ 4
Florida logo
Florida
SEC
Offense
69
Percentile
Defense
67
Percentile
Special Teams
65
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.9
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #20
JT +7 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
46.8%
Early-down success
45.8%
Third-down success
46.9%
Yards/play
6.47
Explosive pass rate
13.1%
Explosive rush rate
13.9%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
42.2%
Early-down success allowed
41.5%
Third-down success allowed
42.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
14
▼ 4
Utah logo
Utah
Big 12
Offense
86
Percentile
Defense
86
Percentile
Special Teams
39
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.6
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #10
JT -4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
50.0%
Early-down success
48.7%
Third-down success
54.0%
Yards/play
6.92
Explosive pass rate
12.9%
Explosive rush rate
17.0%
Sack allowed rate
4.2%

Defense

Success allowed
33.6%
Early-down success allowed
33.9%
Third-down success allowed
30.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
15
▼ 1
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
SEC
Offense
44
Percentile
Defense
90
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.4
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #11
JT -4 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.8%
Early-down success
46.2%
Third-down success
39.8%
Yards/play
6.07
Explosive pass rate
8.9%
Explosive rush rate
16.6%
Sack allowed rate
8.1%

Defense

Success allowed
38.4%
Early-down success allowed
41.1%
Third-down success allowed
31.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
16
▲ 5
Missouri logo
Missouri
SEC
Offense
49
Percentile
Defense
82
Percentile
Special Teams
44
2026 percentile
JT Rating
16.4
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #22
JT +6 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
40.3%
Early-down success
39.6%
Third-down success
43.1%
Yards/play
6.28
Explosive pass rate
14.6%
Explosive rush rate
12.0%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
36.8%
Early-down success allowed
36.0%
Third-down success allowed
37.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
17
▲ 7
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
SEC
Offense
30
Percentile
Defense
65
Percentile
Special Teams
51
2026 percentile
JT Rating
15.1
AP Poll · Week 8
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
43.4%
Early-down success
42.7%
Third-down success
43.4%
Yards/play
5.16
Explosive pass rate
6.6%
Explosive rush rate
13.2%
Sack allowed rate
5.2%

Defense

Success allowed
36.7%
Early-down success allowed
37.9%
Third-down success allowed
31.0%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
18
▲ 12
Auburn logo
Auburn
SEC
Offense
29
Percentile
Defense
70
Percentile
Special Teams
68
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.3
AP Poll · Week 8
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
41.9%
Early-down success
40.4%
Third-down success
44.7%
Yards/play
5.67
Explosive pass rate
9.6%
Explosive rush rate
17.0%
Sack allowed rate
10.2%

Defense

Success allowed
41.9%
Early-down success allowed
41.9%
Third-down success allowed
36.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
19
▼ 2
USC logo
USC
Big Ten
Offense
88
Percentile
Defense
64
Percentile
Special Teams
52
2026 percentile
JT Rating
14.1
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #16
JT -3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.2%
Early-down success
50.5%
Third-down success
49.3%
Yards/play
6.69
Explosive pass rate
14.2%
Explosive rush rate
15.9%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
41.7%
Early-down success allowed
42.2%
Third-down success allowed
33.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
20
▲ 2
SMU logo
SMU
ACC
Offense
82
Percentile
Defense
87
Percentile
Special Teams
44
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.7
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #23
JT +3 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.8%
Early-down success
48.4%
Third-down success
48.0%
Yards/play
7.09
Explosive pass rate
14.6%
Explosive rush rate
14.3%
Sack allowed rate
3.3%

Defense

Success allowed
37.6%
Early-down success allowed
39.5%
Third-down success allowed
27.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
21
▼ 3
Michigan logo
Michigan
Big Ten
Offense
17
Percentile
Defense
96
Percentile
Special Teams
60
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.3
AP Poll · Week 8
AP NR
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
41.3%
Early-down success
40.9%
Third-down success
40.0%
Yards/play
5.38
Explosive pass rate
8.8%
Explosive rush rate
9.7%
Sack allowed rate
6.6%

Defense

Success allowed
34.2%
Early-down success allowed
33.7%
Third-down success allowed
33.4%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
22
▼ 6
BYU logo
BYU
Big 12
Offense
92
Percentile
Defense
87
Percentile
Special Teams
61
2026 percentile
JT Rating
13.1
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #2
JT -20 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
51.8%
Early-down success
50.8%
Third-down success
58.1%
Yards/play
6.95
Explosive pass rate
13.4%
Explosive rush rate
15.5%
Sack allowed rate
2.0%

Defense

Success allowed
36.8%
Early-down success allowed
35.4%
Third-down success allowed
37.8%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
23
▲ 8
Houston logo
Houston
Big 12
Offense
97
Percentile
Defense
61
Percentile
Special Teams
60
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.6
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #14
JT -9 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
55.7%
Early-down success
53.1%
Third-down success
66.3%
Yards/play
6.99
Explosive pass rate
14.3%
Explosive rush rate
14.1%
Sack allowed rate
2.7%

Defense

Success allowed
40.5%
Early-down success allowed
41.1%
Third-down success allowed
38.2%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
24
▲ 3
Iowa logo
Iowa
Big Ten
Offense
62
Percentile
Defense
94
Percentile
Special Teams
71
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.6
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #15
JT -9 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
45.7%
Early-down success
46.7%
Third-down success
39.9%
Yards/play
6.48
Explosive pass rate
8.0%
Explosive rush rate
16.8%
Sack allowed rate
2.6%

Defense

Success allowed
35.4%
Early-down success allowed
35.5%
Third-down success allowed
34.7%
Yards/play allowed
Rank
25
▲ 3
Kentucky logo
Kentucky
SEC
Offense
56
Percentile
Defense
52
Percentile
Special Teams
53
2026 percentile
JT Rating
12.5
AP Poll · Week 8
AP #12
JT -13 vs AP
Team Breakdown+

Offense

Success rate
48.7%
Early-down success
51.8%
Third-down success
30.9%
Yards/play
6.32
Explosive pass rate
12.7%
Explosive rush rate
14.6%
Sack allowed rate
7.2%

Defense

Success allowed
45.2%
Early-down success allowed
43.9%
Third-down success allowed
48.3%
Yards/play allowed
4.18
Explosive pass allowed
4.9%
Explosive rush allowed
8.3%
Sack generated
4.0%

Style

Pass rate
47.4%
Early-down pass rate
44.4%
Plays/drive
6.12

Model Details

JT Rating
28.90
Market Power
29.66
Model Adjustment
-0.76

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.59
Explosive pass allowed
6.8%
Explosive rush allowed
6.2%
Sack generated
7.6%

Style

Pass rate
45.8%
Early-down pass rate
44.8%
Plays/drive
6.35

Model Details

JT Rating
28.04
Market Power
28.48
Model Adjustment
-0.44

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.74
Explosive pass allowed
8.9%
Explosive rush allowed
7.6%
Sack generated
8.5%

Style

Pass rate
48.0%
Early-down pass rate
44.3%
Plays/drive
5.87

Model Details

JT Rating
25.67
Market Power
26.28
Model Adjustment
-0.61

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.64
Explosive pass allowed
14.1%
Explosive rush allowed
8.4%
Sack generated
7.9%

Style

Pass rate
49.9%
Early-down pass rate
45.1%
Plays/drive
5.64

Model Details

JT Rating
25.55
Market Power
26.72
Model Adjustment
-1.17

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.44
Explosive pass allowed
9.2%
Explosive rush allowed
10.7%
Sack generated
11.8%

Style

Pass rate
48.5%
Early-down pass rate
45.9%
Plays/drive
6.64

Model Details

JT Rating
24.73
Market Power
24.38
Model Adjustment
+0.35

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.63
Explosive pass allowed
10.7%
Explosive rush allowed
7.8%
Sack generated
11.0%

Style

Pass rate
44.0%
Early-down pass rate
37.9%
Plays/drive
5.59

Model Details

JT Rating
24.47
Market Power
25.31
Model Adjustment
-0.84

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.29
Explosive pass allowed
5.0%
Explosive rush allowed
9.9%
Sack generated
8.9%

Style

Pass rate
49.1%
Early-down pass rate
45.1%
Plays/drive
5.85

Model Details

JT Rating
23.13
Market Power
23.67
Model Adjustment
-0.54

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.75
Explosive pass allowed
13.3%
Explosive rush allowed
9.4%
Sack generated
5.3%

Style

Pass rate
55.5%
Early-down pass rate
53.9%
Plays/drive
5.89

Model Details

JT Rating
20.11
Market Power
20.48
Model Adjustment
-0.38

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.93
Explosive pass allowed
11.8%
Explosive rush allowed
7.5%
Sack generated
6.5%

Style

Pass rate
54.5%
Early-down pass rate
49.2%
Plays/drive
5.41

Model Details

JT Rating
19.90
Market Power
20.01
Model Adjustment
-0.11

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.41
Explosive pass allowed
7.5%
Explosive rush allowed
15.8%
Sack generated
6.4%

Style

Pass rate
45.6%
Early-down pass rate
43.4%
Plays/drive
5.54

Model Details

JT Rating
18.30
Market Power
17.91
Model Adjustment
+0.39

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.88
Explosive pass allowed
8.8%
Explosive rush allowed
11.1%
Sack generated
12.5%

Style

Pass rate
51.6%
Early-down pass rate
46.4%
Plays/drive
5.43

Model Details

JT Rating
17.36
Market Power
16.71
Model Adjustment
+0.64

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.68
Explosive pass allowed
10.0%
Explosive rush allowed
11.4%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
45.6%
Early-down pass rate
42.5%
Plays/drive
6.17

Model Details

JT Rating
16.93
Market Power
17.01
Model Adjustment
-0.07

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.19
Explosive pass allowed
8.9%
Explosive rush allowed
12.1%
Sack generated
4.2%

Style

Pass rate
46.4%
Early-down pass rate
44.8%
Plays/drive
6.05

Model Details

JT Rating
16.59
Market Power
16.58
Model Adjustment
0.00

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.91
Explosive pass allowed
5.7%
Explosive rush allowed
17.7%
Sack generated
13.0%

Style

Pass rate
41.3%
Early-down pass rate
40.3%
Plays/drive
5.64

Model Details

JT Rating
16.40
Market Power
16.84
Model Adjustment
-0.43

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.12
Explosive pass allowed
9.1%
Explosive rush allowed
12.8%
Sack generated
6.9%

Style

Pass rate
48.1%
Early-down pass rate
39.8%
Plays/drive
5.43

Model Details

JT Rating
16.38
Market Power
16.02
Model Adjustment
+0.36

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.64
Explosive pass allowed
13.6%
Explosive rush allowed
12.6%
Sack generated
3.2%

Style

Pass rate
48.2%
Early-down pass rate
47.3%
Plays/drive
6.28

Model Details

JT Rating
15.06
Market Power
14.13
Model Adjustment
+0.93

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.29
Explosive pass allowed
11.0%
Explosive rush allowed
10.4%
Sack generated
8.0%

Style

Pass rate
51.5%
Early-down pass rate
48.3%
Plays/drive
6.09

Model Details

JT Rating
14.31
Market Power
14.13
Model Adjustment
+0.18

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

6.03
Explosive pass allowed
12.0%
Explosive rush allowed
10.2%
Sack generated
6.5%

Style

Pass rate
51.0%
Early-down pass rate
49.0%
Plays/drive
7.07

Model Details

JT Rating
14.10
Market Power
14.72
Model Adjustment
-0.62

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.15
Explosive pass allowed
7.8%
Explosive rush allowed
13.5%
Sack generated
8.7%

Style

Pass rate
52.5%
Early-down pass rate
49.4%
Plays/drive
6.07

Model Details

JT Rating
13.73
Market Power
12.93
Model Adjustment
+0.80

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.46
Explosive pass allowed
8.0%
Explosive rush allowed
6.5%
Sack generated
8.2%

Style

Pass rate
41.9%
Early-down pass rate
39.6%
Plays/drive
5.43

Model Details

JT Rating
13.34
Market Power
14.74
Model Adjustment
-1.40

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.72
Explosive pass allowed
6.2%
Explosive rush allowed
11.8%
Sack generated
5.9%

Style

Pass rate
42.7%
Early-down pass rate
41.0%
Plays/drive
5.75

Model Details

JT Rating
13.14
Market Power
14.02
Model Adjustment
-0.89

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.81
Explosive pass allowed
11.1%
Explosive rush allowed
10.6%
Sack generated
5.0%

Style

Pass rate
42.3%
Early-down pass rate
41.0%
Plays/drive
6.81

Model Details

JT Rating
12.60
Market Power
12.05
Model Adjustment
+0.54

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

4.58
Explosive pass allowed
11.9%
Explosive rush allowed
4.2%
Sack generated
8.8%

Style

Pass rate
50.2%
Early-down pass rate
46.7%
Plays/drive
5.43

Model Details

JT Rating
12.57
Market Power
11.07
Model Adjustment
+1.50

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.

5.55
Explosive pass allowed
10.2%
Explosive rush allowed
9.4%
Sack generated
6.7%

Style

Pass rate
49.7%
Early-down pass rate
46.0%
Plays/drive
5.53

Model Details

JT Rating
12.45
Market Power
12.99
Model Adjustment
-0.53

Model Adjustment shows how much the team's current underlying performance profile moves its rating above or below the market-power baseline.